Kinship or borrowing? The Relationship of Ripuarian collective nouns with "ge-" + "-ze" to Middle Dutch collective nouns with "ge-" + "-te"
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3726/zwjw.2018.01.05Abstract
A typical characteristic of Central German dialects, especially of the Ripuarian dialect, is that it has collective nouns with ge- + -ze (cf. gesteinze) besides those with ge- + -e (cf. gesteine) corresponding to Dutch gesteente and gestene. A relationship between ge- + -ze and ge- + -te has been assumed for a long time. A corpus-based comparison is given in order to explain the genesis of these different formation types (ge- + -e, ge- + -ze, ge- + -te) and their relations. It seems likely that earlier Dutch formations influenced their Ripuarian counterparts. Rarely, the circumfix ge- + -te also occurs in Ripuarian texts and may be autochthone. One main result is that the suffic -ze in Ripuarian restores the collective formation in the circumfix ge- + -e when it was destroyed by the e-apokope. This is a rare instance where an element of word formation is replaced by another one in order to neutralize the isolation effect of sound change.
This contribution was originally published by Peter Lang Publishing (https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/plg/jwf/2018/00000002/00000001/art00006)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
URN
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Zeitschrift für Wortbildung / Journal of Word Formation

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.